What are the main differences between
When looking at most websites (including Stack Overflow), most use:
instead of:
Key questions:
- What are the main differences between these two button elements?
- Are there specific use cases where one is preferred over the other?
- Are there scenarios where combining both elements makes sense?
- Does using
While <input type="button"> and <button> both create clickable buttons in HTML, they differ fundamentally in their structure, capabilities, and browser behavior. The <button> element is modern, flexible, and supports rich content, while <input type="button"> is simpler but more consistent across browsers. Your observation that many websites still use <input type="button"> is correct, largely due to historical browser compatibility concerns, though modern best practices increasingly favor the <button> element for its greater flexibility.
Contents
- Key Structural Differences Between Button Types
- Content and Styling Capabilities
- Browser Compatibility Considerations
- Form Submission Behavior
- When to Use Each Element
- Combining Both Elements: Strategic Use Cases
- Best Practices and Recommendations
Key Structural Differences
The most fundamental distinction between these elements lies in their HTML syntax and structure. The <button> element is a container element with opening and closing tags, while <input type="button"> is a self-closing void element.
<!-- button element with content -->
<button>Click Me</button>
<!-- input button element -->
<input type="button" value="Click Me">
This structural difference has significant implications for content handling. The <button> element can contain various HTML elements within its tags, including text, images, icons, and even other inline elements. As this vs that documentation explains, “”
In contrast, the <input type="button"> element can only display text through its value attribute and cannot contain any nested HTML elements. This limitation makes <button> far more versatile for creating visually rich interfaces.
Content and Styling Capabilities
Rich Content Support
The <button> element’s ability to contain HTML content provides designers and developers with significantly more flexibility:
<!-- Button with icon and text -->
<button>
<svg class="icon" width="16" height="16">...</svg>
Submit Form
</button>
<!-- Button with image -->
<button>
<img src="logo.png" alt="Company logo">
About Us
</button>
<!-- Button with complex styling -->
<button class="styled-button">
<span class="highlight">Special</span> Offer
</button>
According to CSS-Tricks documentation, "You can probably get away with putting just any HTML inside a button, but MDN points out the ‘permitted content’ of a button is limited to ‘phrasing content’." This means you can include text, links, images, and other inline elements, but not block-level elements like <div> or <p>.
Styling Consistency
While both elements can be styled with CSS, the <button> element generally provides more consistent styling across browsers. The <input type="button"> inherits styling from the input element family, which can sometimes behave differently from button-specific styles.
Modern CSS can style both elements effectively, but the <button> element typically responds more predictably to button-specific styling properties like :hover, :active, and :focus states.
Browser Compatibility Considerations
Legacy Browser Issues
Historically, browser compatibility has been the primary reason developers chose <input type="button"> over <button>. As noted in the research, “”.
The most significant compatibility issues with <button> occurred in older versions of Internet Explorer:
-
IE6 and IE7: These browsers would submit the HTML content of a button as part of the form data rather than the button’s
valueattribute. As one Stack Overflow answer explains, “IE6 and IE7 + WinXP showed the button text being submitted whether or not a modern doctype was used.” -
IE8: In ‘Quirks’ mode, IE8 had similar issues, but behaved correctly in standards mode when a proper doctype was declared.
Modern Browser Support
Today’s browser landscape has improved dramatically. All modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge) support the <button> element consistently and correctly. The main compatibility concerns now revolve around supporting legacy systems that might still use Internet Explorer 9 or earlier.
According to caniuse data, <button> element support is nearly universal across all browsers, with the main exceptions being very old mobile browsers and legacy Internet Explorer versions.
Form Submission Behavior
The behavior of these elements in HTML forms differs significantly, especially regarding form submission:
Default Button Types
The <button> element has three possible type attributes:
type="submit"(default): Submits the formtype="reset": Resets the form fieldstype="button": Performs custom JavaScript action
The <input type="button"> only has one behavior: it performs a custom JavaScript action and does not submit forms by default.
Form Data Submission
When used in forms, <button> elements can cause unexpected behavior if not properly configured:
<!-- This will submit the button's HTML content in some browsers -->
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
<!-- This will submit the button's value attribute -->
<button type="submit" value="submit-btn">Submit</button>
<!-- This input button will only submit its value -->
<input type="submit" value="Submit">
As the Stack Overflow discussion highlights, “IE8 in ‘Quirks’ mode…post the button text. Switch to standards mode and you’ll post the value attribute.”
To avoid these issues, it’s recommended to always specify the type attribute explicitly for <button> elements and use the value attribute consistently.
When to Use Each Element
Use <button> When:
- You need rich content: When your button requires icons, images, or complex HTML markup
- You’re targeting modern browsers: When supporting only modern browsers (IE10+, all current browsers)
- You need semantic HTML: When you want the semantic benefits of the
<button>element - You’re creating custom UI components: When building complex button components with custom behavior
As stated in the research, “the newer <button> element is now the favored way to create buttons” for most modern web applications.
Use <input type="button"> When:
- Supporting legacy browsers: When you need to support Internet Explorer 9 or earlier
- Simple text buttons: When you only need a basic text button without complex content
- Consistency across browsers: When you want identical appearance and behavior across all supported browsers
- Form-specific actions: When creating buttons that need specific form submission behaviors
One developer’s experience from the research: “I use <input type="button"> only when the point of the control is to cause a [form] postback. In all other cases I use <button>.”
Combining Both Elements: Strategic Use Cases
While it might seem like you should choose one or the other, there are scenarios where using both elements strategically makes sense:
Progressive Enhancement Approach
<!-- Basic input button for all browsers -->
<input type="button" value="Click Here" onclick="basicAction()">
<!-- Enhanced button for browsers that support it -->
<button class="enhanced-button" onclick="enhancedAction()">
<span class="icon">🎯</span>
Enhanced Experience
</button>
<script>
// Feature detection for enhanced functionality
if ('HTMLButtonElement' in window) {
document.querySelector('.enhanced-button').style.display = 'inline-block';
}
</script>
Different Button Types in Forms
<form action="/submit" method="post">
<!-- Submit button using input for consistency -->
<input type="submit" value="Submit Form">
<!-- Reset button using button element -->
<button type="reset">Clear Form</button>
<!-- Custom action button using button element -->
<button type="button" onclick="saveDraft()">Save Draft</button>
</form>
Style Consistency Requirements
When you need buttons to appear exactly the same across your application but have different behaviors:
<!-- All buttons use input for consistent styling -->
<input type="submit" class="btn btn-primary" value="Submit">
<input type="button" class="btn btn-primary" value="Cancel" onclick="cancelAction()">
<input type="button" class="btn btn-primary" value="Help" onclick="showHelp()">
Best Practices and Recommendations
Modern Development Approach
For contemporary web development, the <button> element is generally preferred due to its flexibility and semantic advantages. However, there are specific guidelines to follow:
-
Always specify the type attribute: Even though
<button>defaults totype="submit", explicitly declaring it improves code clarity and prevents unexpected behavior. -
Use meaningful values: When using
<button>in forms, always include avalueattribute that clearly identifies the button’s purpose. -
Test across target browsers: Always test button behavior in all browsers you need to support.
CSS Styling Recommendations
/* Consistent styling for both button types */
.btn {
padding: 10px 20px;
border: none;
border-radius: 4px;
cursor: pointer;
font-size: 16px;
transition: all 0.3s ease;
}
/* Specific styling for button elements */
button {
/* Additional button-specific styles */
}
/* Specific styling for input buttons */
input[type="button"] {
/* Additional input button-specific styles */
}
Accessibility Considerations
Both elements should include proper ARIA attributes when needed:
<!-- Accessible button with icon -->
<button aria-label="Search" aria-expanded="false">
<svg class="icon" focusable="false">...</svg>
</button>
<!-- Accessible input button -->
<input type="button" value="Search" aria-label="Search">
Performance Considerations
While performance differences are negligible in most cases, consider that:
<button>elements may have slightly larger DOM trees when containing complex content<input type="button">elements are simpler and may render marginally faster in very complex interfaces
Conclusion
The choice between <button> and <input type="button"> involves balancing flexibility, compatibility, and specific use case requirements. Modern web development increasingly favors the <button> element for its rich content support and semantic benefits, while <input type="button"> remains valuable for legacy browser support and simple use cases requiring maximum consistency.
Key takeaways:
-
Use
<button>for rich content, modern browsers, and semantic HTML when you need flexibility in button content and styling. -
Use
<input type="button">>when supporting legacy browsers, creating simple text buttons, or requiring identical appearance across all supported browsers. -
Consider combining both elements strategically in progressive enhancement approaches or when different button types serve different purposes within the same interface.
-
Always test button behavior across your target browsers, especially when dealing with form submission and JavaScript interactions.
-
Follow accessibility best practices regardless of which element you choose, ensuring all interactive elements are properly labeled and keyboard accessible.
As web standards continue to evolve and browser compatibility becomes less of a concern, the <button> element will likely become the default choice for most button implementations, with <input type="button">> reserved for specific compatibility scenarios.
Sources
- Stack Overflow -
- FreeCodeCamp - What is the difference between
- HTML.com - Button Type In HTML: Here’s Why You Should Always Declare It
- GeeksforGeeks - button tag vs input type=“button” attribute
- Tutorialspoint - What is difference between
- Stack Overflow - vs
- This vs That -
- Codecademy - Whether to use [button] or [input type=“button”]
- Reddit - Should I use or
- David Walsh - The Difference Between Anchors, Inputs and Buttons
- CSS-Tricks - When To Use The Button Element
- Stack Overflow - What disadvantages are there to the
- MDN - HTML forms in legacy browsers
- MDN - Handling common HTML and CSS problems