NeuroAgent

Extract Filename Without Extension in Python

Learn multiple methods to extract filename without extension in Python. Compare pathlib, os.path, and string approaches with code examples.

#cross-platform-development#file-processing#os-path-methods#pathlib-tutorial#python-file-operations#python-programming#python-string-manipulation
Question

How do I extract the filename without the extension from a file path in Python?

Example:
Input: "/path/to/some/file.txt"
Output: "file"

What are the different methods to achieve this in Python?

NeuroAgent

There are several effective methods to extract the filename without the extension from a file path in Python, with the most modern and recommended approach being the pathlib.Path().stem method. This object-oriented technique provides clean, readable code that handles multiple extensions correctly and works across different operating systems.

Contents

Using pathlib.Path().stem

The pathlib module introduced in Python 3.4 provides the most elegant and object-oriented approach to path manipulation. The stem attribute specifically returns the filename without the extension.

python
from pathlib import Path

file_path = "/path/to/some/file.txt"
filename_without_ext = Path(file_path).stem
print(filename_without_ext)  # Output: "file"

Key advantages:

  • Clean syntax: Single method call to get the desired result
  • Cross-platform compatibility: Automatically handles different path separators
  • Multiple extension handling: Only removes the last extension
  • Object-oriented approach: Enables method chaining for complex operations

Multiple extensions example:

python
path_with_multiple_ext = Path("/path/to/archive.tar.gz")
print(path_with_multiple_ext.stem)  # Output: "archive.tar"

The pathlib module documentation shows that stem specifically extracts the filename without the final extension, making it ideal for most use cases.

Using os.path.splitext() with os.path.basename()

The traditional approach combines two functions from the os.path module: basename() to extract the filename from the full path, and splitext() to separate the extension.

python
import os

file_path = "/path/to/some/file.txt"
filename_without_ext = os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(file_path))[0]
print(filename_without_ext)  # Output: "file"

Step-by-step breakdown:

  1. os.path.basename(file_path) → "file.txt"
  2. os.path.splitext("file.txt") → ("file", ".txt")
  3. [0] → "file"

Advantages:

  • Backward compatibility: Works in older Python versions (pre-3.4)
  • Reliable: Handles edge cases consistently
  • No dependencies: Part of standard library since Python 2.0

As noted in the Stack Overflow discussion, this method is particularly useful when working with legacy codebases or when you need maximum compatibility.

Using str.split() method

For simple cases, you can use basic string manipulation with the split() method. This approach is straightforward but less robust than the dedicated path manipulation methods.

python
file_path = "/path/to/some/file.txt"
filename_without_ext = file_path.split('/')[-1].split('.')[0]
print(filename_without_ext)  # Output: "file"

Method explanation:

  1. file_path.split('/')[-1] → "file.txt"
  2. "file.txt".split('.')[0] → "file"

Limitations:

  • Platform-dependent: Uses / separator, won’t work with Windows paths
  • Edge case issues: Fails with files that have no extension or multiple dots
  • Less readable: More complex to understand than dedicated path methods

According to GeeksforGeeks, while this method works for simple cases, it’s not recommended for production code due to these reliability concerns.

Performance Comparison

When choosing between methods, performance can be a consideration, especially in applications that process many files.

Method Performance Readability Robustness
pathlib.Path().stem Slower but acceptable Excellent High
os.path.splitext() Faster than pathlib Good High
str.split() Fastest but unreliable Poor Low

As mentioned in the Ruff documentation, pathlib can be less performant than os.path alternatives, especially on older Python versions. However, the performance difference is usually negligible for most applications.

Benchmark example:

python
import timeit
from pathlib import Path
import os

# Test path
test_path = "/path/to/some/file.txt"

# pathlib.Path().stem
time_pathlib = timeit.timeit(lambda: Path(test_path).stem, number=10000)

# os.path.splitext()
time_os = timeit.timeit(lambda: os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(test_path))[0], number=10000)

# str.split()
time_split = timeit.timeit(lambda: test_path.split('/')[-1].split('.')[0], number=10000)

print(f"pathlib: {time_pathlib:.6f}s")
print(f"os.path: {time_os:.6f}s") 
print(f"split(): {time_split:.6f}s")

Edge Cases and Considerations

Different methods handle various edge cases differently, which is important to consider when choosing your approach.

Files without extensions:

python
no_ext_path = "/path/to/config"
print(Path(no_ext_path).stem)  # "config"
print(os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(no_ext_path))[0])  # "config"

Hidden files (Unix-style):

python
hidden_path = "/home/user/.bashrc"
print(Path(hidden_path).stem)  # ".bashrc" (keeps leading dot)
print(os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(hidden_path))[0])  # ".bashrc"

Files with multiple extensions:

python
multi_ext = "/path/to/file.tar.gz"
print(Path(multi_ext).stem)  # "file.tar" (only removes last extension)
print(os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(multi_ext))[0])  # "file.tar"

According to the Python documentation, pathlib specifically analyzes only the final component of the path and removes the last extension, making it consistent across different file naming patterns.

Complete Examples

Here are complete, practical examples showing each method in different contexts:

Directory Processing Example

python
from pathlib import Path
import os

def get_filenames_without_ext(path):
    """Return list of filenames without extensions from a directory"""
    # Using pathlib
    return [file.stem for file in Path(path).glob('*') if file.is_file()]

def get_filenames_without_ext_os(path):
    """Same function using os.path"""
    files = []
    for filename in os.listdir(path):
        filepath = os.path.join(path, filename)
        if os.path.isfile(filepath):
            files.append(os.path.splitext(filename)[0])
    return files

# Usage
directory = "/path/to/files"
filenames = get_filenames_without_ext(directory)
print(filenames)  # ['file1', 'file2', 'archive.tar']

Error Handling Example

python
from pathlib import Path
import os

def safe_filename_extraction(path):
    """Safely extract filename with error handling"""
    try:
        # Using pathlib (recommended)
        return Path(path).stem
    except Exception as e:
        # Fallback to os.path
        try:
            return os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(path))[0]
        except:
            # Final fallback: just the last part of path
            return path.split('/')[-1].split('\\')[-1].split('.')[0]

Cross-Platform Solution

python
from pathlib import Path
import platform

def cross_platform_filename(path):
    """Works on any operating system"""
    # pathlib automatically handles different path separators
    return Path(path).stem

# Works on Windows: "C:\\Users\\user\\file.txt"
# Works on Unix: "/home/user/file.txt"
# Works equally well
print(cross_platform_filename("C:\\Users\\user\\file.txt"))
print(cross_platform_filename("/home/user/file.txt"))

Sources

  1. Stack Overflow - How do I get the filename without the extension from a path in Python?
  2. GeeksforGeeks - Get filename from path without extension using Python
  3. Medium - Extracting File Names Without Extensions in Python
  4. AskPython - Extracting Filename without Extension from a File Path in Python
  5. Spark By Examples - Get Filename Without Extension in Python
  6. Delft Stack - How to Python Get Filename Without Extension From Path
  7. Ruff Documentation - os-path-splitext (PTH122)
  8. Python Module of the Week - pathlib

Conclusion

Extracting filenames without extensions in Python can be achieved through several methods, each with its own advantages:

  • Use pathlib.Path().stem for modern Python (3.4+): This is the recommended approach offering clean syntax, cross-platform compatibility, and reliable handling of edge cases. It’s perfect for new projects and codebases that can use recent Python versions.

  • Use os.path.splitext() with os.path.basename() for legacy systems: This traditional method provides excellent backward compatibility and handles edge cases reliably. It’s ideal when working with older Python versions or maintaining legacy code.

  • Avoid str.split() for production code: While simple, this method is fragile and fails with various edge cases and different operating systems.

For most modern Python applications, pathlib.Path().stem provides the best balance of readability, reliability, and performance. The object-oriented approach makes your code more maintainable and less error-prone, especially when dealing with complex file operations.

When choosing a method, consider your Python version, compatibility requirements, and the complexity of your file naming patterns. For most use cases, the pathlib approach will serve you well now and in future Python versions.

How to handle multiple file extensions when extracting filename in Python?What's the most efficient method for extracting filenames without extensions in large file directories?How to extract filename without extension from a URL in Python?What are the edge cases to consider when removing file extensions in Python?How to extract filename without extension recursively from nested directories in Python?What's the difference between pathlib.Path.stem and os.path.splitext for filename extraction?
Ask NeuroAgent