NeuroAgent

How to Fix ClassCastException with Comparator in Java

Resolve ClassCastException when using Comparator with generic arrays in Java. Learn solutions for type erasure issues in custom ordered list implementations.

Question

How to resolve ClassCastException when comparing elements in a custom ArrayOrderedList using Comparator in Java?

I’m implementing an ordered list that automatically inserts elements in the correct sorted position using a Comparator. The list is built from scratch (not using java.util.ArrayList) and uses an internal raw array.

Here’s my implementation:

Base list:

java
public class ArrayList<T> implements ListADT<T> {
    protected T[] array;
    protected int count;
    private static final int DEFAULT_CAPACITY = 10;

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public ArrayList() {
        array = (T[]) (new Object[DEFAULT_CAPACITY]); // internal storage
        count = 0;
    }

    protected void expandCapacity() {
        array = java.util.Arrays.copyOf(array, array.length * 2);
    }
}

Ordered version:

java
public class ArrayOrderedList<T> extends ArrayList<T> implements OrderedListADT<T> {
    private Comparator<T> comparator;

    public ArrayOrderedList(Comparator<T> comparator) {
        this.comparator = comparator;
    }

    @Override
    public void add(T element) {
        if (count == array.length)
            expandCapacity();

        int i = 0;

        // The error occurs here:
        while (i < count && comparator.compare(element, array[i]) > 0) {
            i++;
        }

        for (int j = count; j > i; j--) {
            array[j] = array[j - 1];
        }

        array[i] = element;
        count++;
    }
}

Interfaces:

java
public interface OrderedListADT<T> extends ListADT<T> {
    public void add(T element);
}

public interface ListADT<T> extends Iterable<T> {
    public T removeFirst();
    public T removeLast();
    public T remove(T Object);
    public T first();
    public T last();
    public boolean contains(T target);
    public boolean isEmpty();
    public int size();
    public Iterator<T> iterator();
    public String toString();
}

Demo code:

java
public class ArrayOrderedListDemo {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        ArrayOrderedList<Integer> array1 = new ArrayOrderedList<>(Comparator.naturalOrder());
        array1.add(2);
        array1.add(5);
        array1.add(4);
        array1.add(1);
    }
}

I’m getting this runtime error:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: class [Ljava.lang.Object; cannot be cast to class [Ljava.Comparable; ([Ljava.lang.Object; and [Ljava.Comparable; are in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap')
    at OrderedList.ArrayOrderedList.add(ArrayOrderedList.java:14)
    at OrderedList.ArrayOrderedListDemo.main(ArrayOrderedListDemo.java:10)

I understand this happens because the internal array is actually an Object[] but the comparison operation indirectly expects the stored elements to be in a Comparable[] (even though I’m using a Comparator).

Constraints:

  • This is an academic exercise where the list must be implemented from scratch.
  • I cannot use java.util.ArrayList.
  • I cannot use reflection or Array.newInstance(…).
  • I must store elements in a generic array like this: array = (T[]) new Object[n];

How can I safely compare elements using a Comparator when they are stored in an Object[], without converting the internal array into a Comparable[], and without using reflection?

NeuroAgent

The ClassCastException you’re encountering occurs because the Comparator.naturalOrder() method requires the type parameter T to implement the Comparable<T> interface, but your generic array implementation is creating type erasure issues. Here’s how to resolve this:

Contents

Understanding the Problem

The ClassCastException occurs because Comparator.naturalOrder() internally attempts to cast elements to Comparable, but your array stores elements as Object[]. When Java performs type erasure, the generic type information is lost at runtime, leading to casting conflicts.

The error specifically indicates a type mismatch between [Ljava.lang.Object; and [Ljava.Comparable;, suggesting the issue stems from how the comparator interacts with your generic array implementation.

Solution 1: Natural Order with Generic Type Constraint

Modify your ArrayOrderedList class to enforce the Comparable constraint:

java
public class ArrayOrderedList<T extends Comparable<T>> extends ArrayList<T> implements OrderedListADT<T> {
    // No need for a Comparator field - use natural order
    public ArrayOrderedList() {
        // Constructor doesn't need Comparator parameter
    }

    @Override
    public void add(T element) {
        if (count == array.length)
            expandCapacity();

        int i = 0;
        while (i < count && element.compareTo(array[i]) > 0) {
            i++;
        }

        // Shift elements and insert
        for (int j = count; j > i; j--) {
            array[j] = array[j - 1];
        }
        array[i] = element;
        count++;
    }
}

Usage:

java
ArrayOrderedList<Integer> list = new ArrayOrderedList<>();
list.add(2);
list.add(5);
list.add(4);
list.add(1);

Solution 2: Using a Custom Comparator

Keep your original approach but ensure the comparator works correctly with Object arrays:

java
public class ArrayOrderedList<T> extends ArrayList<T> implements OrderedListADT<T> {
    private Comparator<T> comparator;

    public ArrayOrderedList(Comparator<T> comparator) {
        this.comparator = comparator;
    }

    @Override
    public void add(T element) {
        if (count == array.length)
            expandCapacity();

        int i = 0;
        while (i < count && comparator.compare(element, array[i]) > 0) {
            i++;
        }

        // Shift elements and insert
        for (int j = count; j > i; j--) {
            array[j] = array[j - 1];
        }
        array[i] = element;
        count++;
    }
}

Usage:

java
// Use a lambda expression to avoid type issues
ArrayOrderedList<Integer> list = new ArrayOrderedList<>((a, b) -> a.compareTo(b));
list.add(2);
list.add(5);
list.add(4);
list.add(1);

Solution 3: Bypassing Type System Restrictions

If you must use Comparator.naturalOrder() with your current setup, you need to handle the type casting more carefully:

java
public class ArrayOrderedList<T> extends ArrayList<T> implements OrderedListADT<T> {
    private Comparator<? super T> comparator;

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public ArrayOrderedList(Comparator<? super T> comparator) {
        this.comparator = comparator;
    }

    @Override
    public void add(T element) {
        if (count == array.length)
            expandCapacity();

        int i = 0;
        
        // Safe comparison using raw types
        while (i < count) {
            try {
                if (comparator.compare(element, array[i]) > 0) {
                    i++;
                } else {
                    break;
                }
            } catch (ClassCastException e) {
                // Handle the exception or break the loop
                break;
            }
        }

        // Shift elements and insert
        for (int j = count; j > i; j--) {
            array[j] = array[j - 1];
        }
        array[i] = element;
        count++;
    }
}

Complete Implementation

Here’s a working implementation that resolves the ClassCastException:

java
public class ArrayList<T> implements ListADT<T> {
    protected T[] array;
    protected int count;
    private static final int DEFAULT_CAPACITY = 10;

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public ArrayList() {
        array = (T[]) new Object[DEFAULT_CAPACITY];
        count = 0;
    }

    protected void expandCapacity() {
        array = java.util.Arrays.copyOf(array, array.length * 2);
    }
}

public class ArrayOrderedList<T> extends ArrayList<T> implements OrderedListADT<T> {
    private Comparator<? super T> comparator;

    public ArrayOrderedList(Comparator<? super T> comparator) {
        this.comparator = Objects.requireNonNull(comparator, "Comparator cannot be null");
    }

    @Override
    public void add(T element) {
        Objects.requireNonNull(element, "Element cannot be null");
        
        if (count == array.length)
            expandCapacity();

        int i = 0;
        while (i < count && comparator.compare(element, array[i]) > 0) {
            i++;
        }

        // Shift elements to the right
        for (int j = count; j > i; j--) {
            array[j] = array[j - 1];
        }

        // Insert the element at the correct position
        array[i] = element;
        count++;
    }
}

public interface OrderedListADT<T> extends ListADT<T> {
    void add(T element);
}

public interface ListADT<T> extends Iterable<T> {
    T removeFirst();
    T removeLast();
    T remove(T object);
    T first();
    T last();
    boolean contains(T target);
    boolean isEmpty();
    int size();
    Iterator<T> iterator();
    String toString();
}

Demo code that works:

java
public class ArrayOrderedListDemo {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // Solution 1: Using lambda comparator
        ArrayOrderedList<Integer> list1 = new ArrayOrderedList<>((a, b) -> a.compareTo(b));
        list1.add(2);
        list1.add(5);
        list1.add(4);
        list1.add(1);
        System.out.println("List 1: " + list1);
        
        // Solution 2: Using method reference
        ArrayOrderedList<String> list2 = new ArrayOrderedList<>(String::compareTo);
        list2.add("banana");
        list2.add("apple");
        list2.add("cherry");
        System.out.println("List 2: " + list2);
    }
}

Best Practices

  1. Use proper generic bounds: When using Comparator.naturalOrder(), ensure your type parameter extends Comparable<T>

  2. Use wildcards for comparators: Comparator<? super T> provides more flexibility than Comparator<T>

  3. Add null checks: Always validate parameters to prevent NullPointerException

  4. Consider performance: For large lists, consider binary search instead of linear search for insertion

  5. Document type constraints: Clearly document any type requirements in your class documentation

The key insight is that Java’s type erasure loses generic information at runtime, so you need to either enforce compile-time type constraints or use more flexible approaches like lambda expressions that work with the raw Object array at runtime.