NeuroAgent

How to Effectively Provide LLMs with Entire Project Code

Effective methods to provide large language models with project code while bypassing context window limitations. Tools and best practices for AI code assistants.

How can I effectively provide neural networks (Grok, ChatGPT, DeepSeek) with entire project code for understanding and subsequent modification?

I actively use large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Claude as development assistants, but I’ve encountered a fundamental limitation: how to familiarize the model with a large project’s code that exceeds the context window limit of a single session?

The problem:

  • Direct upload of multiple files is impossible due to interface restrictions
  • ZIP archives are not supported
  • Direct links to GitHub repositories often don’t work (the model cannot or won’t parse them)

My current solution:
I wrote a script that recursively traverses the project directory and generates a single text file with the following format:

// File: /src/main.py
<content of main.py>
// ====================
// File: /src/utils/helper.py
<content of helper.py>
// ====================
...

This approach “works more or less” but is a makeshift solution that’s inconvenient to update and navigate.

My question:
What alternative and more productive approaches exist for this task?

Are there specialized tools (for example, tree, ripgrep in combination with prompts) for this purpose?

Do you use any third-party tools or plugins that help package projects into “context packages” for LLMs?

Are there best practices for structuring such project “dumps” so that the model understands them better?

NeuroAgent

Effective Approaches for Providing Large Project Code to Neural Networks

To effectively provide large project code to neural networks, there are specialized tools and approaches that help overcome context window limitations. The best solutions include using code assistants with RAG support, integration with code knowledge base management systems, and modern frameworks that automatically split projects into semantic blocks for analysis.

Table of Contents

Modern Tools for Solving the Problem

Specialized Frameworks for Code Work

One of the most promising approaches is using frameworks specifically designed for code analysis with LLMs. These tools include:

  • CodeLlama - Meta’s LLM with built-in code support, capable of working with large files
  • CodeT5 - Salesforce’s model optimized for understanding code structure
  • SantaCoder - from BigCode, effective for analyzing code in different languages

These models often have extended context windows (up to 128K tokens) and better understand code semantics.

Tools for Creating Code Knowledge Bases

Modern solutions allow creating “smart” code indexes that can be efficiently queried:

Semantic Search systems like LangChain or LlamaIndex allow converting code into vector representations and performing semantic search across the project.

Example implementation using LangChain:

python
from langchain.vectorstores import Chroma
from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter

# Split code into semantic blocks
text_splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(chunk_size=2000, chunk_overlap=200)
code_chunks = text_splitter.split_text(project_code)

# Create vector store
vectorstore = Chroma.from_texts(code_chunks, OpenAIEmbeddings())

Integration with Version Control Systems

Modern approaches include integration with Git for effective context management:

  • GitHub Copilot X - uses extended context to understand project structure
  • Sourcegraph - provides semantic search across code repositories
  • Copilot Chat - can analyze active branches and changes

Code Context Management Strategies

Hierarchical Approach to Splitting

Instead of simply combining all files into one document, a multi-level structure is recommended:

  1. Abstract level - README files, architectural diagrams, module descriptions
  2. Module level - description of each module with its interfaces
  3. File level - only key files with minimal dependencies

Example context structure:

# Project architectural overview
├── General module structure
├── API contracts
└── Component dependencies

# Authentication module
├── auth.py (main logic)
├── models/auth.py
└── tests/test_auth.py

# Data processing module
└── data_processor.py

Dynamic Context Management

For large projects, an approach with dynamic context selection is effective:

python
def build_context(project_path, target_file, depth=2):
    """
    Builds context for a specific file considering dependencies
    """
    context = []
    
    # Add target file
    target_content = read_file(target_file)
    context.append(f"// File: {target_file}\n{target_content}")
    
    # Find direct dependencies
    dependencies = find_dependencies(target_file, depth)
    
    for dep in dependencies:
        dep_content = read_file(dep)
        context.append(f"// Dependency: {dep}\n{dep_content}")
    
    return "\n".join(context)

Caching and Incremental Updates

For efficient work with the codebase, caching systems are implemented:

  • File hashing to determine changes
  • Differential context updates
  • Context versioning for different project branches

Integration with Development Workflows

IDE Plugins and Extensions

Modern IDEs offer built-in solutions for working with LLMs:

  • GitHub Copilot - built-in assistant with project context
  • Cursor - editor with advanced AI integration
  • CodeWhisperer from AWS - understands project structure

Example configuration in VS Code:

json
{
  "github.copilot.advanced": {
    "context": {
      "projectStructure": true,
      "fileDependencies": true,
      "codeHistory": true
    }
  }
}

CI/CD Integration

Integrating LLM into the build pipeline allows:

  • Generating documentation based on code
  • Checking architectural consistency
  • Suggesting refactoring based on code analysis

Example GitHub Actions workflow:

yaml
name: AI Code Analysis
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
  analyze:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
    - name: Setup Node.js
      uses: actions/setup-node@v3
    - name: Analyze with LLM
      run: |
        npx code-analyzer --repo . --model gpt-4

Best Practices for Project Structuring

Semantic File Splitting

For better model understanding, code should be structured by semantic features:

  • Group classes and objects together
  • Separate interfaces and implementations
  • Store tests and main logic in separate files

Example context formatting:

// UserService interface
interface UserService {
    createUser(userData: UserData): Promise<User>;
    getUser(userId: string): Promise<User>;
}

// Service implementation
class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {
    // method implementations
}

// Unit tests
describe('UserService', () => {
    // tests
});

Dependency Management

Context should include only necessary dependencies:

python
def minimal_context(file_path):
    """
    Returns minimal context for a file with direct dependencies
    """
    required_files = [file_path]
    required_files.extend(find_direct_imports(file_path))
    
    return {
        'main_file': file_path,
        'dependencies': required_files,
        'context': read_files(required_files)
    }

Documentation and Comments

Context should include:

  • README file with project description
  • Technical documentation on architecture
  • JSDoc or Python docstrings for key functions

Limitations and Future Development

Current Limitations of Existing Approaches

Despite progress, challenges remain:

  • Context window limitations even in modern models
  • Quality of understanding complex architectural patterns
  • Token costs when working with large codebases

Promising Development Directions

The future includes:

  • Multimodal models capable of analyzing both code and architectural diagrams
  • Agent systems with ability to independently navigate the codebase
  • Hybrid approaches combining RAG and fine-tuning

For effective interaction with neural networks, it’s recommended to combine several approaches: use specialized frameworks to create code knowledge bases, implement hierarchical context management, and integrate solutions with existing development tools.

Conclusion

  1. Use specialized frameworks like LangChain or LlamaIndex to create semantic code indexes
  2. Implement hierarchical approach to project splitting at levels: architectural, module, and file
  3. Integrate solutions with IDEs via plugins like GitHub Copilot for automatic context analysis
  4. Optimize context formatting considering code semantics and dependency structure
  5. Experiment with models featuring extended context windows (GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 2) for working with large projects

These approaches will help overcome context window limitations and create an effective system for interacting with neural networks for analyzing and improving large project code.