How to Create SVN Branch: svn copy Command & Best Practices
Learn how to create a branch in SVN (Subversion) using the svn copy command. Follow step-by-step process, standard repository structure, merging tips, and best practices for effective branch management in Subversion.
How do I create a branch in SVN (Subversion)? What is the command or process for creating a new branch, and what are the best practices for managing branches in SVN?
Creating a branch in SVN (Subversion) boils down to a simple svn copy command that duplicates your trunk—say, svn copy trunk branches/my-new-feature—creating an instant, space-efficient copy in the repository. This keeps your main development line clean while you work independently on features or fixes. Follow best practices like using a standard structure (/trunk, /branches, /tags) and keeping branches short-lived to avoid merge hell later.
Contents
- What Are SVN Branches?
- How to Create a Branch in SVN
- Standard SVN Repository Structure
- Best Practices for SVN Branch Management
- Merging Branches Back to Trunk
- Common SVN Branching Pitfalls
- Sources
- Conclusion
What Are SVN Branches?
SVN branches let you split off parallel lines of development without disrupting the main codebase. Think of it like photocopying your project tree: you get an identical starting point that evolves on its own. Why bother? Features take time, bugs pop up unexpectedly, and releases demand stability—branches isolate that chaos.
Subversion handles this efficiently through its copy-on-write mechanism. No massive file duplication happens upfront; changes are tracked lazily. The official SVN book nails it: branching is just “making a copy of your project tree in the repository.” Simple, right? But get the process wrong, and you’ll face tangled histories or lost work.
Ever tried hacking on a hotfix while someone’s mid-feature? Branches prevent that nightmare. They’re essential for teams, whether you’re solo or coordinating dozens.
How to Create a Branch in SVN
Ready to branch? Fire up your terminal. Assume your repo looks like /project/trunk holding the main code. The magic command is svn copy.
Here’s the exact syntax:
svn copy ^/trunk ^/branches/my-feature-branch -m "Branch for new login system"
That ^ shorthand points to your repo root—handy for remote access. Hit enter, and SVN commits the branch atomically. No checkout needed first; it’s all server-side.
Working locally? Switch paths:
svn copy file:///path/to/repo/trunk file:///path/to/repo/branches/my-feature-branch -m "Initial branch"
Or from a working copy:
svn copy trunk ../branches/my-feature-branch -m "Local branch creation"
Check it worked with svn ls ^/branches. Boom—your svn branches list shows the new one. The TutorialsPoint guide walks through a full example: copy trunk to branches/jerry_branch, commit Jerry’s array sort, then merge later.
Pro tip: Always include a descriptive message. Branches live forever in history, so name them clearly like feature/login-v2 or bugfix/SEC-123. What if you’re using TortoiseSVN? Right-click trunk, select “Branch/Tag”—same svn copy under the hood.
This cheap copy means zero downtime. Your team pulls updates seamlessly while you diverge.
Standard SVN Repository Structure
Don’t wing it—stick to the classic layout. Root your repo like this:
/project /trunk ← Main development (unstable) /branches ← Feature/hotfix/release branches /tags ← Stable snapshots (never edit!)
This setup scales. Trunk stays for bleeding-edge work. Branches hold experiments. Tags freeze releases, like /tags/v1.2.0.
The Apache Subversion best practices recommends exactly this: /trunk for main line, /branches for everything else. Why? Tools, scripts, and humans expect it. Mess it up, and integrations break.
Create your first branch? svn mkdir ^/branches -m "Add branches dir" if missing. Then copy as above. For multiple projects? Nest under /companies/acme/project/trunk.
Visualize it:
svn ls ^/
trunk/
branches/
feature-xyz/
release-1.1/
tags/
v1.0/
Clean. Predictable. Teams onboard faster.
Best Practices for SVN Branch Management
Branches aren’t free lunch—mismanage them, and merges turn toxic. Start with purpose: branch for features >2 days, hotfixes, or releases. Short-lived wins: aim for days or weeks, not months.
From the DevOpsSchool strategy post: keep trunk stable, merge often, name consistently (branches/feature/awesome-login). Checklist time:
- Name smartly:
bugfix/CORE-456, notbob-branch. - Branch per task: One feature, one branch.
- Update before branching:
svn upon trunk first. - Commit atomically: Branch creation is one commit.
- Model choice: “Branch-when-needed” for most teams—trunk daily, branch only for long tasks.
Integrate continuously. Rebase? SVN doesn’t natively, but regular merges mimic it. Tools like svn merge --reintegrate help.
What about size? Keep 'em lean—full repo copies bloat history. Subversion’s copy-on-write keeps it efficient anyway.
Teams thrive here. Solo dev? Still isolates risky refactors.
Merging Branches Back to Trunk
Branching’s half the story—merging glues it back. Switch to trunk: cd /path/to/trunk; svn up.
Dry-run first: svn merge --dry-run ^/branches/my-feature ^.
Looks good? Real merge:
svn merge ^/branches/my-feature .
svn commit -m "Merge feature XYZ from branch"
For reintegration (branch fully merged): svn merge --reintegrate ^/branches/my-feature.
Conflicts? SVN flags them—edit, svn resolved file, commit. The TutorialsPoint example shows Jerry’s branch merge: svn merge ../branches/jerry_branch/ .
Post-merge, delete the branch? svn rm ^/branches/my-feature -m "Feature merged, branch deleted". Keeps history tidy.
Frequency matters. Daily merges catch divergences early. Tools like svn log -g graph it visually.
Miss this, and trunk drifts. Nail it, and velocity soars.
Common SVN Branching Pitfalls
We’ve all been there—branch from outdated trunk, merge explodes. Or forgetting --record-only for cherry-picks.
Pitfall 1: Long-lived branches. They fossilize, ignoring trunk fixes. Solution: forward-merge weekly.
Pitfall 2: Poor naming. temp branches haunt repos. Enforce conventions via hooks.
Pitfall 3: No structure. Flat branches dir? Chaos. Subdirs: branches/feature/, branches/release/.
Git users switching? SVN branches are global, not lightweight—plan accordingly. Apache docs warn: “Keep branches small.”
Local edits before branching? Don’t—commit or stash first. And always svn switch ^/branches/my-branch to work there.
Debug with svn status, svn diff. Tools like SmartSVN visualize merges.
Avoid these, and SVN branches become your superpower.
Sources
- Using Branches — Official guide to svn copy command for creating branches: https://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.using.html
- SVN - Branching — Step-by-step examples for branching and merging in Subversion: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/svn/svn_branching.htm
- Subversion Best Practices — Recommended repository structure and branching models: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/doc/user/svn-best-practices.html
- SVN (Subversion) Branching Strategy — When to branch, naming conventions, and checklists: https://www.devopsschool.com/blog/svn-subversion-branching-strategy/
Conclusion
Mastering SVN branches with svn copy trunk branches/my-feature unlocks smooth teamwork and stable trunks. Stick to /trunk-branches-tags, branch purposefully, merge relentlessly—that’s the recipe for subversion success. Your repo stays lean, history clear, and projects ship faster. Dive in; the first branch hooks you.